Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Britney Meltdown Interview UPDATE 2

It seems that there was some inaccuracy in the reports yesterday about The Great Britney Spears OK Magazine Meltdown Interview of 2007. According to Page Six, the gown that was used to scoop up the puppy poo was actually a Zac Posen, not a Chanel. Apologies for the confusion, loyal readers!

On the upside, there's a little more to the tale:
AFTER wiping her fried chicken-grease-covered hands on a $274 dress and picking up her puppy's poop with a $6,700 Zac Posen gown, Britney Spears shocked OK! magazine staffers at her photo shoot last Thursday by storming out with thousands of dollars worth of merchandise.

Spears allegedly fled the shoot wearing $12,861 worth of jewelry, a $974 Vera Wang dress, $380 Lanvin heels and a $281 Pucci scarf. When the clothes she ruined are added, the total comes to $21,267.

AWESOME. The funny thing is that she didn't even like the clothes that had been picked out for her because they were not "sexy" enough--ie, not skanky-one-eyed-hillbilly-streetwalker-on-meth enough--for her taste. And yet she stole the lot!

I wonder where this will take our beloved Brit-Brit. There are rumors a' swirlin' that Fed Ex may be trying to get custody of the kids...and this is happening right when she is trying to record a comeback album. Will this debacle endear her to her fans even more, or will her publique eventually weary of all the bad publicity? I think the former! But only time will tell...


Anonymous said...

Damn you, Britney, damn you. I can't believe you have actually managed to make K-Fed look like the mature, responsible parent!

By the way, apparently immediately before the profanity-filled tirade she launched at the paparazzi a few days ago, she had taken the boys for a cruise around Santa Monica -- without any life jackets. Nice!

Anonymous said...

WHEN is this issue of OK coming out, 'cause it weren't this week's!!! I need to see me some crazy, grease-stained couture-wearing Britney!!!1!